A Market Rhode Island Government Has Left as a Last Resort


I’ve tried to get some follow-up information from Felicia Delgado, of the Parent Support Network of Rhode Island, regarding her testimony before the Rhode Island House Oversight Committee about the harm that a non-functional Unified Health Infrastructure Project (UHIP), otherwise known as RI Bridges, has done to Rhode Islanders’ lives:

Others have lost their jobs because of these lost benefits and UHIP-delayed payments from the state to long-term health-care facilities.

At least 20 people — she emphasized they didn’t prostitute previously and don’t have substance-abuse problems — have turned to prostitution to pay for rent, childcare and food and fend off homelessness. Delgado declined to identify the people.

Mostly, I’m interested to know if she’s seen any progress, but I also wanted to ask if she had information about how this happens as a functional matter.  Did the people just know what street corners to hang out on?  Did they use Craig’s List?  Did they slip into an existing network, involving pimps?  Or do they start with people whom they already know?

What’s striking is that prostitution would be a fall-back occupation for people who hadn’t done it before.  Granted, it probably pays better than most other transactions for which people will pay unskilled entrants, but it comes with a high degree of risk and an appropriate social squeamishness.

UHIP is a problem and a blight all on its own, but a thriving economy without such a pervasive regime of regulations and licensing requirements would not only keep people from needing the services in the first place, but also give them other options when government messes up.  Instead, Rhode Islanders suffer through this process of government micromanagement of our economy’s creating a lack of opportunity, which government attempts to fix with welfare programs.  And when that doesn’t work… prostitution.

  • Rhett Hardwick

    I think most would be amazed if we knew how many women work in the “sex trades”. I have seen amazing numbers but dismiss them as “advocacy statistics”. I don’t have that many apartments, but I get about 3 applications a year from women who describe themselves as “self employed”, or “working under the table”. They refer to themselves as “providing services”. Some offer to provide bank statements showing large weekly deposits. Frequently Googling the telephone number provided leads to a “Backpage” or similar ad. Surprisingly. at least to me, few are very attractive. I won’t take them, even when they assure me that they only do “out calls”, or that they specialize in the elderly. They are still “underworld”, which I assume is true of their friends and associates. I don’t want them around my buildings.

    Just past college age, I had a friend who taught “phys ed” in the Miami schools. He worked part time for an “escort service” that catered to older women. He invested his “earnings” in Coconut Grove real estate and did rather well,.