An Objective Standard for Russian “Collusion”
It got this far because of what appears, right now, to be overreach by Mueller, egged on by partisan Democrats & their media enablers. 1/
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
Mueller's investigation drew a clear standard that the public could understand: 2/
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
..Don Jr. talking to foreigners about Presidential campaign oppo was investigable as a possible *criminal* offense — 3/
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
— not just as a matter for a counter-intelligence investigation, but as a criminal offense. 4/
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
OK, as @KurtSchlichter might say, if those are new rules, those are the new rules. 5/
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
But if you're going to use the criminal justice system to try to overturn the results of an election.. 6/
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
..then you have to meet the public's expectation that the criminal justice system runs with some degree of impartially. 7/
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
So if Mueller is investigating "Russian interference", he can't go only after the Trump campaign,.. 8/
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
..while ignoring high-profile, credible evidence that the DNC/Clinton campaign was buying oppo from foreign sources.. 9/
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
..and still expect people to quietly accept the result. 10/x
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017
What is illegal is not made legal by using politically-connected Democratic lawyers as middlemen.
— Andrew Morse (@CAndrewMorse) October 29, 2017