Conscientious Versus Issue-Conscious


I wouldn’t claim that I help this curve much, but it certainly has the ring of truth:

Do our behaviors really reflect our beliefs? New research suggests that, when it comes to climate change, the answer is no. And that goes for both skeptics and believers.

Participants in a year-long study who doubted the scientific consensus on the issue “opposed policy solutions,” but at the same time, they “were most likely to report engaging in individual-level, pro-environmental behaviors,” writes a research team led by University of Michigan psychologist Michael Hall.

Conversely, those who expressed the greatest belief in, and concern about, the warming environment “were most supportive of government climate policies, but least likely to report individual-level actions.”

This applies to other issues, like charity.  Big-government types who want to use tax dollars to solve every problem sometimes behave as if that’s their contribution, so they don’t have to use any of their own money additionally.

The central consideration, here, is probably that concern about an issue is a different thing from agreement with a certain approach to solving the problem (especially in the balance of other issues), and “conservatives” tend to be more comfortable with this distinction. The lesson of the above findings may not be that self-identified environmentalists are more likely to be hypocrites, but that people who are willing to take individual action are more likely to see that as a solution.

To Our Readers: We need your support to challenge the progressive mainstream media narrative. Your donation helps us deliver the truth to Rhode Islanders. Please give now.

I do think, though, that there’s something to the idea of “moral licensing”:

Previous research has found doing something altruistic—even buying organic foods—gives us license to engage in selfish activity. We’ve “earned” points in our own mind. So if you’ve pledged some money to Greenpeace, you feel entitled to enjoying the convenience of a plastic bag.

(Via Eric Worrall.)

  • Rhett Hardwick

    While I cannot locate a link at the moment, I recall several surveys showing conservatives to be nearly twice as generous with their time and money as conservatives.
    “gives us license to engage in selfish activity” Why do I immediately think of “carbon credits”?

    • guest

      Following Justin’s logic, if conservatives are twice as generous with their time and money does that make them twice as selfish? Hmmm….I don’t think that’s the point he is trying to make.

      • Rhett Hardwick

        I regard generosity as an “individual level action”. I’m thinking more of “stopping to help” than “making a donation”


    Why should I sacrifice if I can get other people to do it for me? #ALGORE

  • Merle The Monster

    Katz. Your first sentence contains an error, or actually more of a Freudian slip.

    • Justin Katz

      Thank you for bringing the typo to my attention.