There it is again. Joanne Jacobs writes on a problem that it just isn’t fashionable to care about solving:
We track school success by race and family income, but ignore the consequences of growing up in unstable, fatherless families, writes Ian Rowe.
Boys are more vulnerable to fatherlessness than their sisters, when it comes to school misbehavior, cognitive disability, low test scores, dropping out of high school and juvenile crime.
Rowe also cites the newly released study, Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States, which found “higher rates of father presence among low-income black households are associated with better outcomes for black boys.”
Addressing the problem of fatherlessness would require a return to more-traditional values and family structures, and that’s simply not a possibility for people of a certain ideology. Unfortunately, that ideology controls large segments of our society and culture.
These side effects (as a charitable person would see them) provide a valuable lesson in how we should discern what is good. Professing an intention to help people is worthless if one’s solutions create worse problems or even, more accurately, barricade the way to the correct solution.
We can consolidate the gains our society has made in areas such as equality without assenting to the deadly ideological virus that has piggybacked on good intentions and infected the body politic.