Income Inequity: the Fruit of RI’s Progressive Shift

justin-katz-avatar-smiling

It’s difficult not to think a lot of the talk about income inequality isn’t entirely sincere, but rather politically expedient.  Let’s stipulate that the amount of income inequality we have right now is bad; we still have to answer as a separate question what we should do about it.  Handing power to government officials is one option, but the case has to be made and is subject to reevaluation.  When people won’t make the case or reevaluate, the remaining conclusion is that they really just want the powerful government, with income inequality as a convenient excuse.

Thus, we get stories like “Studies: Income inequity in Providence third-highest in nation” in the Providence Journal, as the one-party (Democrat) rule in the state solidifies and becomes increasingly progressive:

In Providence, the poorest households earn $12,118 annually, compared with the wealthiest, which bring home $202,021 on average, according to the data. The ratio between incomes widened by 1.3 during the two-year period studied, starting at 15.4 and growing to 16.7 from 2014 to 2016, according to the data.

This is the fruit of low-growth, centrally planned progressive policy.  In order to bring up those on the lower end of the scale, we have to empower them to take money from the wealthy through voluntary transactions by offering services and competing.  High taxes create disincentive to produce things and earn money, occupational licensing and other regulations make it more difficult for people to work, and welfare programs that create government dependency reduce the incentive to do so.

To Our Readers: We need your support to challenge the progressive mainstream media narrative. Your donation helps us deliver the truth to Rhode Islanders. Please give now.

This is a veritable recipe for income inequality.  However, it does create opportunity for the likes of Gina Raimondo, David Cicilline, Brett Smiley, and Aaron Regunberg, whose continued fortunes depend on convincing people that we need to funnel our society’s wealth through government.

And at the same time that government is pushing more people into government programs in Rhode Island, the very same government has been proving that it can’t be trusted to run its own programs.



  • Mike678

    While it’s true that the Gov’t is inefficient and not the answer to the so-called “income inequality,” perhaps the best thing to do is not use the terms coined by the so-called “progressives” designed to forward an agenda.

    What is income “inequality”? Since man rose, inequality existed. Some worked harder than others. Some were smarter. Inequality was everywhere, yet most understood that this was the land of opportunity. Strive and succeed. More recently we have the growth of greed and envy masking as “justice”. The rise of sloth and the victim mentality–if you succeed it must be at my expense. One writer said it well–to paraphrase “in the 50’s a man would drive by in an expensive auto and my dad would say “you too can drive that car if you go to school and work hard.” Now we just envy the driver and key the car…. ” This is “progress.”

    • Christopher C. Reed

      Envy never goes out of fashion.
      For all their schooling, progs seem never to have heard of Wilfredo Pareto, the economist who discovered the 80/20 law.
      He observed that in French real estate, 80% of the titles were held by 20% of the families.
      It’s what economists call a ‘power law’.
      On the African veldt, 20% of the lions get 80% of the antelope. In sales, 20% of the brokers get 80% of the deals. And so on.
      So…let’s repeal reality. Right?

Quantcast