Observations of Political Scene on Out-of-State Raimondo Fundraising

justin-katz-avatar-smiling

Let’s dispense with the minor observation of today’s Political Scene in the Providence Journal:

Rhode Islanders contributed [to Gina Raimondo’s campaign fund] more than any other geographic group — a total of $440,557 between Jan. 1 and June 30 to Raimondo’s anticipated bid for reelection, according to her most recent filings with the state Board of Elections. She banked another $23,025 from Rhode Island-based PACs, such as the RI Laborers PAC and the Hospital Association of Rhode Island.

Isn’t this kind of expected?  In fact, isn’t the more-newsworthy point something that Katherine Gregg never mentions: namely, that Raimondo has received roughly 60% of her donations, this year, from people out of state?  I can’t help but feel that if Raimondo were a Republican the Providence Journal’s question would be the same as mine:  Whom is this woman serving?  A big majority of Raimondo’s political income, so to speak, comes from people out of state.  How central can the state’s interests actually be to her?

To Our Readers: We need your support to challenge the progressive mainstream media narrative. Your donation helps us deliver the truth to Rhode Islanders. Please give now.

The more-intriguing observation (which may help to answer the first) comes from this:

Also among Raimondo’s first-quarter contributors is Peter G. Peterson, a one-time U.S. Commerce secretary and CEO of prominent companies including Lehman Brothers before founding the private equity firm Blackstone Group, which he grew “into a global leader in alternative investments,″ according to his online biography.

This may be mostly a story about how small the world of investment elites actually is, but as I’ve detailed before, Blackstone purchased the parent company of Wexford — of I-195-subsidy fame — in 2015 and spun off the Wexford component in 2016.  It would go beyond the scope of my resources to investigate the amount of profit these transactions created and sort out the timing of Raimondo’s Commerce RI dealings with Wexford, but it’s telling nonetheless.

Regardless of the specifics, one could easily summarize that the governor Rhode Island receives a substantial majority of her political donations from people outside of the state that she governs, and some not-insignificant number of her donors are conspicuously connected to deals that she makes as the governor.  These associations sure ought to raise more questions than those posed by a weekly political-interest column.

Click to help us keep the doors open.



  • Raymond Carter

    It’s heartwarming that so many out of state business people are selflessly looking out for good government in this state.
    LOL

  • DeeDeePloma

    i call what she is doing influence peddling.
    The political scene
    mentioned the campaign money she has received from outsiders -NY-Ill
    & CA. Last week on her so called vaca, she had a fundraiser in
    Denver, CO.
    These outsiders are buying control of RI gov’t and exerting undo influence on everything in
    this state by buying the chief executive with campaign contributions.
    In
    my opinion she’s soliciting bribes from non-voting outsiders, giving
    them greater control than RI citizens–a form of influence peddling in
    great proportions. raimondo
    is passing out millions and millions of dollars to people who have never been to RI and probably won’t. Why
    should they; she’s sending them the money. And
    we know people don’t give without receiving something back.
    Her
    influence peddling started with the pension non-fix hoax (transfer of
    wealth from pensioners to Wall St hedgefund investors for campaign
    support) and next week it will be one year for the UHIP debacle and UHIP
    is still not fixed but her pal Bill Murphy is the lobbyist for
    Deloitte- UHIP so no way is she going to mess w/Murphy!

Quantcast