Progressivism Begets Income Inequality

justin-katz-avatar-smiling

The Providence Journal had an odd little leak from the forthcoming Brooking Institution study that may give hints about the focus of the study, but that definitely illustrates a point about the progressive, government-centric way in which the state has been governed for decades:

The Brookings Institution think tank says Providence had one of the largest income gaps in the country in 2014, according to Census data it analyzed.

The top 5 percent of earners in Providence made 15 times what the bottom 20 percent did, ranking it No. 5 in income inequality among cities nationwide.

Broadening to the entire Providence metro region, the ranking slips to 14th, which isn’t much of an improvement.  If this is a clue for what to expect from Brookings, then one can presuppose that the progressive think tanks suggestions are going to point Rhode Island in exactly the wrong direction.

This progressive, top-down model, in which the smaht people tell the rest of us how to live and how to structure our affairs puts the elite at the top, selling its plans and benefits to those at the bottom, with those in the middle targeted for forced compliance.  The reason is simple:  As a matter of basic politics, the people in the middle are the group from which real opposition to the elite can come — economically, socially, and politically.

The aristocracy in control of the state therefore has incentive to either to draw people into their fold or to push them toward the bottom, while ensuring that those at the bottom never rise to the middle.  Thus: income inequality.



  • Slow Poke

    Those in charge of running RI have used the same game plan for generations now- essentially, progressively Left dogma, with the (resigned?) complicity of the few Republicans in the mix. This has brought us to our current dismal economic circumstances. It’s hard to believe that all these politicians are not smart enough to move us in the right direction, so the only other conclusion is that we have government by and for the connected few at the expense of the rest of us, who exist merely to pay the freight.

    • Mike678

      It’s called “democratic socialism.”

  • GaryM

    Justin, there is simple math here. We have a flight of wage earners being replaced by those on the government dole.

    The brilliance of the Brooking’s crowd is to exploit that fact into a false statistic known as “income inequality”.

    Restated: If you put 13 year-old children behind the wheel in RI, Brooking would turn the resulting mayhem into a need for tolls to make the roads safer for our children.

Quantcast