You know those table-top games for which you tilt a board in order to get a ball to roll through a maze or obstacle course of some kind? They’re an excellent metaphor for the problem with using government to tilt society to achieve socially engineered outcomes. The ball rolls, picking up momentum, and the means of controlling the board can be awkward.
To improve upon the metaphor imagine that the obstacles sometimes move around in unpredictable ways… and you’re trying to turn the knobs while wearing slippery mittens.
A century and more ago, maybe it was possible to believe in the totalitarian, yet beneficent, governance by experts, but in the intervening years, the experts should have concluded that it can’t be done. The solution is to use cultural means to change things in the culture and structure the laws to provide a neutral playing field.
Instead, progressives have turned both knobs, as if they can get the ball to hop over all the walls. So, we get a social standard that promotes girls and women while demeaning boys and men and a legal regime in which it is permissible to discriminate only against the latter. The obvious question that some of us were asking decades ago was: Even if we grant that male chauvinism is too powerful of a force, how will we know when to stop correcting for it?
Mark Perry, a University of Michigan-Flint professor, appears to be the first to discover that the “STEM gender gap” doesn’t exactly exist after all. According to his recent AEI report, women now earn 50.6 percent of all STEM bachelor’s degrees, and are also overrepresented in graduate school.
While 50.6 percent is only a slight majority, this translates into 8,500 more female STEM graduates per year and about 33,000 more women in STEM grad school. And because college is now a woman’s domain, it’s likely these small disparities will expand over time. …
“The 60/40 gender disparity in college degrees favoring women that the Department of Education forecasts within the next decade should be of much greater concern to society than failing to achieve 50/50 gender parity in a few STEM fields, in terms of the future implications for the labor market, for family formation and other concerns.”
Returning to the metaphor above, anybody who has played those games knows that the trick is to start changing the tilt of the board before the ball has reached a turn. Otherwise, momentum will carry it along in a direction you don’t want to go. Well, we’ve arguably just missed the turn, and with no signs that adjustments are coming.
Instead, we can expect activists to highlight such findings as the fact that, with more choices available to women, fewer of them have gone into computer science. This evidence of people acting according to their interests will no doubt inspire our cultural engineers to keep on pushing, even as imbalances and injustices open up and cause untold damage to our society.