For my weekly call-in on John DePetro’s WNRI 1380 AM/95.1 FM show, this week, the topics were Judge Flanders’s announcement and chances, the PawSox thoughts of Attleboro, and the Raimondo-bomb of UHIP.
At its Monday meeting, the Rhode Island Board of Elections directed its lawyer to propose fixes to the loophole created in 2008, which no longer required proper identification for those registering, in person, to vote … as required by 2003 federal law. Despite baseless attacks against Ken Block, it turns out that his research was accurate.
At about the same time they issued a not-ready-for-primetime Environmental Assessment of the first two proposed toll gantry locations in southern Rhode Island, the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (RIDOT) also issued an “investment grade tolling study” of the entire RhodeWorks toll plan – a study, we should note, which cost the taxpayers of Rhode Island a cool million dollars.
During their show, “Changing Gears”, yesterday on WPRO, Mike Collins and Chris Maxwell broadly hinted at major problems with this tolling study. Maxwell remarked that the state “would have been wise to put it through the shredder because it is very favorable” to the truckers’ anti-toll position.
Stay tuned on this – or drop by RIDOT’s hearing on Tuesday to hear about it first hand. That’s when the Rhode Island Trucking Association (represented by Maxwell) and the American Trucking Association (represented by Collins) will point out chapter and verse how RIDOT’s own toll study apparently torpedoes Governor Raimondo’s highly destructive, wasteful and unnecessary RhodeWorks toll plan.
Remember, Governor Raimondo and the General Assembly are only going to toll trucks! *snort*
RIDOT has identified the locations of the first two proposed toll gantry locations in southern Rhode Island. This Tuesday, they will be holding a workshop and taking public comment on their newly-released (not to say rushed out the door) Environmental Assessment of the locations. The problem is that the assessment suffers from exactly the same serious flaw as the ill-fated UHIP system: it was released before it was ready. “Continue Reading” to learn why – and for deets about attending the hearing.
— gary sasse (@gssasse) November 18, 2017
Not interested in Moore; Trump the drunken wrecking ball operator; and the needle that conservatives may be able to thread to social victory.
I do love that opening line in the ProJo editorial? "For reasons that are still not clear…" The reasons are crystal clear!!! To register as many democrat votes as possible to ensure the democrat's continued death grip on our State! That's the "reason" @projo! https://t.co/4Bg4JZdRJ6
— LoughlinRI1 (@LoughlinRI1) November 17, 2017
I think at this point we're all used to her going to "meetings" across the country that coincide with big money fundraisers. And we're also used to footing the bill for her travel expenses. https://t.co/BoxOEEbO07
— Rep Mike Chippendale (@MikeWChip) November 15, 2017
For my weekly call-in on John DePetro’s WNRI 1380 AM/95.1 FM show, this week, the topics were the Raimondo-Assumpico messaging struggle, Fung’s poll, and the Board of Elections’ admission.
Because it serves their political interest, progressives are capsizing the sexual revolution cruise ship, and if conservatives can keep our feet, we’ll find our ship is right-side-up when it’s done.
It has seemed more and more to be the case that the demographic cross-tabs of surveys find two groups to have surprisingly similar views: blacks and Republicans. I noted this some years ago, when a Friedman Foundation survey about school choice found almost exact agreement between the two groups. Somewhere in my reading, recently, similar results emerged for transgenderism.
I didn’t find it surprising, therefore, when an article for Atlanta Black Star about a children’s author who set out to remedy the problem that “representation of kids of color in children’s books is often hard to find” also said things like this:
“I love telling our story and showing my husband as the alpha male leading the family,” [Geiszel] Godoy said. “It seems tradition has been thrown to the side recently, and I felt it was important for kids to see a mother and father together in a children’s book.”
“We need to normalize the Black family again. The mainstream media is hellbent on pushing the narrative of the broken home, but it’s not true,” Godoy said.
Our culture’s problems aren’t difficult to identify, and one of modern political life’s greatest frustrations is how much identity politics and the welfare state’s method of buying off constituencies keeps us from implementing policy that would reflect the beliefs of large majorities, even of minorities.
They do it because they know we are powerless to stop it. That is, until November 6, 2018. This behavior has to stop. All we have to do is elect someone else and the shock waves will be felt. https://t.co/Pboh5MEZ56
— IG_ in_ RI (@Need_an_IG) November 12, 2017
I have no doubt this dynamic plays itself out across Rhode Island, but as another instance, it seems the Tiverton Town Council thinks democracy is mostly legitimate to the extent that it empowers them to make decisions for everybody else, with minimal accountability:
Beware this trio’s “looking.” Take away the political spin, and the objection of [Town Council Member John Edwards, the Fifith,] and his posse is clearly to limit the ability of voters to have control over town government more often than every two years at a heated election with state and national races on the ballot. Because their political friends have an advantage during regular November elections, that’s when they want the key decisions made.
Every budget for the past six years of the [financial town referendum] has received a majority vote, and usually, it isn’t even close. Members of the Budget Committee who put forward last year’s low, 0.5%-increase budget were all elected. Members of the Charter Review Commission were also all elected. Edwards just doesn’t like that his friends didn’t win.
The responsibility for the rest of us is to make sure that the insiders learn one lesson good and hard: At some point, we’re going to stop dabbling around the edges and take over the governing bodies, and when we do so, we’re going to change a whole lot more than the year-to-year tax increases.
Grover Norquist put his finger on something true when he said, at the RI Center for Freedom & Prosperity’s banquette on Friday, that progressives are motivated by the possibility of taking things from other people and making them do things, while conservatives are motivated by the desire to be left alone.
Too often, being left alone includes being able to avoid getting involved in the day to day operation of government, but there’s bound to be a breaking point. People will put up with quite a bit of abuse if it means they get to keep their Monday nights more or less to themselves, but if the abuse becomes too substantial, they’ll give up those Monday nights to meetings… and then work to reduce the amount of time they have to spend telling other people what to do.
— Mike Stenhouse (@MSten37) November 12, 2017
The sexist children of the General Assembly, blue states as a fleet of Titanics, Rand got God wrong, and a progressive contradiction.
Although his focus is Fall River, Marc Monroe Dion’s lament of the well-informed observer in the Fall River Herald rings true much more broadly, certainly throughout this one-party region of festering apathy:
And Wednesday morning, when another dud of a Fall River election was over, there wasn’t anything left to do but pick up the crumpled napkins.
I say “dud” because hardly anyone votes, and I say “hardly anyone” because I write the history blog for this paper, and am often immersed in old newspaper stories from the days when a 60 or 70 percent turnout was the norm.
People who work in newsrooms live very close to the political process, so we overestimate the public’s level of interest, and we do that no matter how many 30 percent turnouts crop up in our stories. Politics in Fall River is like soccer in the rest the country. It’s going to get popular NEXT year.
As I’ve written again and again, what people seem most to want from government is the ability not to pay attention. Back when those old newspaper articles that Dion references were written, life was more difficult and entertainment more scarce. Moreover, government did less and was therefore easier to get one’s head around.
What the busy schedules of modern life haven’t pushed aside, the progressive big-government mudslide of the last century has swept away. Not only has government been made to seem like the existential battle of partisan tribes, but it’s so pervasive and intricate that the average person feels unqualified to assert his or her own interests, at least in contravention of insiders’ priorities. Add to those dynamics the promise that central planning can relieve us of the need to pay attention.
We’ve gotten to the point, however, that people just want to be left out of the pressure and vitriol, free to live their lives. The way back from that feeling isn’t obvious, unless we can promote the principle that government has no right to do things beyond the ken of the people.
If you haven’t listened to Providence Journal commentary page editor Ed Achorn’s inaugural podcast, interviewing Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello (D, Cranston), do so. Because the Projo has decided, for some reason, not to give the podcast a prominent place on its Web site, here it is:
I recommend the episode for a reason that I almost hesitate to admit. I’ve always found Mattiello’s speaking style to be, let’s say, slow and roundabout, like listening to waves come in… if each one were made to go through some long spiral before crashing. But listening to him offer a slow-down explanation for his coolness to the PawSox deal and then expressing his (he says) long-standing sense that the state government lacked the internal expertise not only to implement UHIP, but even to consolidate offices into an Executive Office of Health and Human Services (EOHHS) in the first place, I have to say it was a relief to hear somebody in state government talk in that way.
Yes, yes, he’s a politician, and staking out ground that is skeptical of government isn’t exactly a risk in his district. And of course, we should be skeptical, ourselves, when his solution isn’t to suggest unraveling the messes completely, but to figure out a way to make them work. Moreover, even if his talk were music to a conservative’s ears, we should still advocate for the other 74 legislators to stop handing the speaker so much power.
All that said, however, and even though he clearly has a sense of government’s role with which I differ to a nearly revolutionary degree, in comparison with the likes of Governor Gina Raimondo, let alone the reckless and ideological blindness of the state’s progressives, Mattiello sounds like an insider who will at least say, “no,” to the insiders’ worst tendencies when outsiders object.
That may not be much, but in Rhode Island, it’s something.
Fung tells Cranston Herald he’ll propose a new round of RI pension changes: “more 401k programs for state employees” https://t.co/swSsUXx6Cm
— Ted Nesi (@TedNesi) November 2, 2017
This sounds like fun, and a much healthier approach to the politico-culture wars than shooting up a baseball field full of Republicans. Patrick Courrielche’s article on Breitbartdescribes some of the key plot points of an ongoing reality
TV stream that one might title, The Deplorables Versus Hollywood.
The anonymous users of 4chan, or “anons” as they call themselves, often operate like a mercenary intelligence agency – analyzing satellite imagery, audio, and various other online data sources to attack their targets…not unlike the characters from Mission Impossible. For kids that have both grown up on the Internet and learned to hate Hollywood right back – this activity is their version of escapism…replacing traditional TV shows and films. The anons took [left-wing actor Shia LaBeouf’s] new live stream [of a protest flag somewhere in America] as an invitation to capture the flag – and were determined to take it down and replace it at all costs…even if it meant breaking a few laws.
To be clear, by “breaking a few laws,” we’re talking about trespassing for the sake of a prank. Of course, trespassing isn’t the most disconcerting aspect of the story. I’m concerned that the Internet really does enable an ad hoc community of online chatters to become something akin to an intelligence agency, but that cat’s out of the bag, and frankly, I’m not sure I’m all that much more worried about these powers in the hands of pranksters than in the hands of government agents.
Some of the responses of America’s tech barons under questioning by Rhode Island’s far-left Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse should raise concerns about the future of freedom in the United States. Of course, we should keep in mind that these are private corporations that can make their own decisions, but they do talk and act as if they’re somehow more fundamental to society than that. And so:
Twitter’s acting general counsel, Sean Edgett, told Whitehouse and other members of the Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on crime and terrorism that detecting foreign-based influence campaigns run through phony shell corporations set up as American companies is a challenge. …
All three witnesses also agreed on the threat presented by shell corporations.
“Anything that prevents us from policing the authenticity of our users is a menace,” said Stretch.
It isn’t difficult to imagine freedom — whether explicit in law or simply part of the fabric of American culture — as just such a “menace.”
We accept that people will use freedom in ways that allow them to take advantage of other people because it’s unavoidable, and it would be unacceptable to give government (or oligarchs) the power to set the line between taking advantage of freedom and simply utilizing it in ways that powerful people don’t like. The fact that powerful people didn’t like the outcome of an electoral contest would be a poor reason to pressure tech companies to set up roadblocks to speech.
Instead, we should seek to educate people sufficiently that a few bogus stories on Facebook won’t dupe enough of them to change the course of history. We should also encourage more-respectable purveyors of news to get their bias under control so that they have the credibility to offer objective resources.
— RI Ctr for Freedom⚓️ (@RICenterFreedom) November 1, 2017
Two tweets posted on Twitter today within one minute of each other are telling, as well as related to part of my conversation with John DePetro for my weekly call-in yesterday. First:
— Patricia Morgan (@repmorgan) November 1, 2017
— RI KIDS COUNT (@RIKidsCount) November 1, 2017
I don’t juxtapose these to promote Patricia Morgan, or even to advocate against Gina Raimondo. An impression of Democrat Governor Gina Raimondo has been building, and it could (and should) be a barrier to her reelection no matter how much money she’s able to dump into Rhode Island’s relatively small media market.
When it comes to actual crises and errors in the executive branch, Raimondo takes an incremental approach. A new revelation puts UHIP in the news, so she comes up with something that appears to be a response and walks away again. Meanwhile, her affection for photo ops and staged events is well established.
That isn’t leadership, and people know it isn’t leadership. Whatever collage of pleasant feelings canned photo ops might generate can be washed away by manifest bad management. To the extent that her ample professional staff (in and out of the campaign) believes that photo-ops are indispensable, every single one of them should be of a leader fixing problems.
— Joseph R. Paolino Jr (@joepaolinojr) October 29, 2017
For my weekly call-in on John DePetro’s WADK 1540 AM show, last week, the topics were Tanzi’s story, Morgan’s announcement, Regunberg’s intention, and Fung’s challenge.