Being a conservative or traditionalist in New England means being attacked for zealotry if you’re uncompromising and attacked for hypocrisy (or something) when you think strategically. Such is the case with GoLocalProv’s page-leading primary-day swipe at Rhode Island Right to Life. (If nothing else, the article illustrates why campaign finance laws should make no distinction between official media and mere pamphleteers when it comes to unconstitutional restrictions of free speech during election time.)
Critics are questioning why a Rhode Island pro-life group is endorsing candidates who a pro-choice — including Republican gubernatorial candidate Allan Fung.
Fung, who has been on the record saying he is an abortion-rights advocate, was endorsed by the group Rhode Island Right to Life, who also endorsed 13 other candidates for statewide and General Assembly seats
The evidence of Fung as an “advocate” is apparently his statement that he’s pro-choice during a recent debate. Right to Life’s explanation for its endorsement suggests the term might be a bit strong when applied to Fung:
The mailer, which calls Fung the “Pro-Life Choice,” says that Fung “opposes using your taxpayer dollars to pay for abortion-on-demand, opposes late-term abortion, and supports our efforts to make pro-life options available through HealthSource RI.”
I have no insights into the endorsement or Fung’s positions beyond what’s reported, but having gone through the exercise of endorsing candidates in the past, I know it can be a difficult call. In this case, I wouldn’t even call it difficult.
Imagine you’re involved with a single-issue group, and you’re faced with a field of six candidates. One of them supports every near-term, plausible legislative goal that you have but says that he would be on the other side if your state somehow became the unlikely battleground of a rebellion against an opposing and activist federal government. All of the other candidates would range from passive support of your opposition in every particular to active advocacy of the opposition’s most extreme positions.
Should it be a scandal if you endorse the first candidate?