Here’s How a Unionized Workforce Teaches Your Children (Warwick Example)
This sort of news never ceases to blow my mind, leaving me unable to understand how parents can stand for this sort of environment for their children’s education:
The implementation of electronic grading in the [Warwick] district has become a bargaining chip as the union and the School Committee continue to be locked in a contract dispute. …
Citing several other emails, Ahearn said parents would not speak publicly about the issue for fear that their children could face retaliation from teachers.
If the cost or other concerns keep the district away from online grading, that’s one thing, but for the district not to be able to fully use a system for which it is already paying $180,000 is outrageous. Apply this same ridiculous standard across the educational board, and you’ll have a sense of why Rhode Island schools are struggling. Add in the district’s chronic absenteeism, and the picture fills in as to why it’s so desperate to close down schools to keep pace with declining enrollment.
Of course, as Larry Sand notes while pointing out some WikiLeaks evidence that the National Education Association worked with the Democrat Party to undermine presidential endorsement votes, teachers don’t have much of a choice when it comes to their quote-unquote representation.
This arrangement isn’t advisable for any professional environment, but in a system meant to teach children, it’s simply unconscionable. Teachers unions are top-down schemes to pay left-wing activists big bucks with taxpayer dollars so they coordinate with political operatives while manipulating education in a way that will radically change society.