Seriously – A No-Bid Bill?
This past weekend, during his Saturday morning show on WPRO, John Loughlin, drawing on his experience as a former state rep, listed the hallmarks of a bad bill, one of which was that it pops up after May 1. The Providence Journal’s Kathy Gregg has spotted one such late entry.
A bill to waive competitive bidding on major state construction and demolition projects is headed for a Senate Labor Committee hearing on Wednesday.
I’m not sure what is more alarming, the concept of not soliciting bids for state projects that exceed $10,000 or the “I-know-nothing” attitude of … well, the bill’s lead sponsor.
Asked about the need for the legislation, the lead sponsor — Sen. Joshua Miller, D-Cranston — said, “I think I haven’t had a chance to totally get a big picture of it on my own. I was kind of waiting for the hearing.” As for who asked him to introduce the bill, he said, “some people involved [in] construction … I think it was specific to a couple of state projects on campuses, either Rhode Island or University of Rhode Island.’’
Could you be a little more vague and uninformed, please, about a bill that you yourself submitted?
A serious question for any of the bill’s sponsors: can you please articulate how a state and/or its taxpayers, a state whose unofficial motto is “I know a guy”, would benefit by the removal of competitive bidding for the award of taxpayer funded projects?
Monique is a data junkie, contributor to the Ocean State Current and Anchor Rising and researcher for the Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity. Please consider supporting the terrific work of the Center here:
https://secure.piryx.com/donate/7rkChZKP/RI-Center-for-Freedom-and-Prosperity/

