First Quarter Single-Family Home Sales Picture Mostly Bleak in RI

For most cities and towns in Rhode Island, an analysis of real estate transactions in the first quarter of 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011 does not paint a rosy picture.

Today’s RISC-Y Business newsletter from the Rhode Island Statewide Coalition (RISC) included a link to a blog post by Keith Jurow of Business Insider titled “The Truth About the ‘Housing Bottom’: Home Prices Across the Northeast Are in Total Freefall.”  In support of the title’s claim, Jurow “spent several days” investigating local real estate data available through the William Raveis Local Housing Data tool, comparing February 2012 sales to February 2011 sales.

From Rhode Island, Jurow listed the dropping median sales prices of three communities: Providence, down 5.5%, Warwick, down 12.2%, and Pawtucket, down 18.3%.  With the Current’s more-specific interest in Rhode Island, however, I thought I’d see what the data shows for all of the available cities and towns.  Finding that the data is now available through March, I thought a more complete picture would be drawn by using the “three months ending” tables — that is, the data for the first quarter of the calendar year.

The table below compares single-family home sales for each city and town in the first three months of 2012 against the first three months of 2011.  Shading of cells indicates a negative number.  Depending on the statistic in question, negative numbers aren’t necessarily bad.  In the column showing the amount that the town’s personal real estate inventory has changed, for case in point, a reduced number of houses on the market means people are buying more quickly than people are deciding to sell, which is likely to drive prices up.

Consequently, the condition most likely to indicate that the bottom of the market has been reached and recovery is underway would be increasing sales, decreasing inventory, and increasing median prices.  In Rhode Island, those circumstances are only present in Foster.  (It’s important to note the small number of houses involved there, though.)

Conversely, the least hopeful snapshot of the data exists when there are fewer sales in a market with greater inventory, with those houses that do sell going for less money.  That is the case in Barrington, Exeter, Smithfield, Tiverton, and Woonsocket.  The most common situation in this data is of increasing sales, rising inventories, and falling prices.

Looking at the drop in median sales price, the five worst-performing towns were:

  1. Warren (-33.3%)
  2. Barrington (-30.7%)
  3. Scituate (-29.2%)
  4. Hopkinton (-26.3%)
  5. Woonsocket (-21.3%)

Median sales price doesn’t tell the whole story, however.  If prices have dropped while sales are up and inventory is down, that could indicate that the bottom of the market has been reached and a turnaround is beginning.  That appears to be the case in Glocester and Little Compton.

Purely for an idea of where the cities and towns stand when all three trends are taken into account, the Current created a “downward spiral index” that adds the changes in sales and median prices and subtracts the change in inventory.  No attempt was made to weight each factor, and real estate professionals may provide local considerations that merit adjustments.

In order from most-bleak to least-bleak, the 18 communities with negative “downward spiral” scores are:

  1. Central Falls (note the very small sales base, however)
  2. Woonsocket
  3. Tiverton
  4. Exeter
  5. Smithfield
  6. Barrington
  7. Portsmouth
  8. East Greenwich
  9. Richmond
  10. Warren
  11. Warwick
  12. Bristol
  13. Providence
  14. South Kingstown
  15. Cranston
  16. North Kingstown
  17. West Warwick
  18. East Providence

 
Rhode Island Cities and Towns Single-Family Home Sales, 1Q11 to 1Q12

Sales Sales change (%) Price per Sq. Ft. Inventory change (%) Median sales price change (%)
Barrington 33 -8.3 193 5.2 -30.7
Bristol 21 0.0 172 10.8 -10.3
Burrillville 25 47.1 118 9.5 1.3
Central Falls 4 33.3 56 128.6 -2.5
Charlestown 34 61.9 247 15.8 13.5
Coventry 91 56.9 116 3.7 6.9
Cranston 118 18.0 173 15.4 -16.9
Cumberland 77 63.8 144 5.5 -11.4
East Greenwich 26 0.0 179 28.7 -10.4
East Providence 56 7.7 118 3.9 -10.2
Exeter 11 -31.3 152 20.0 -2.9
Foster 11 83.3 125 -28.2 37.7
Glocester 20 81.8 135 -2.4 -1.3
Hopkinton 15 150.0 127 35.1 -26.3
Jamestown 11 10.0 357 6.5 19.5
Johnston 62 34.8 104 2.7 -3.0
Lincoln 32 45.5 144 36.9 -7.2
Little Compton 7 16.7 394 -10.6 -12.9
Middletown 21 90.9 251 15.5 -2.7
Narragansett 43 138.9 252 13.5 -10.1
Newport 32 28.0 255 8.7 6.0
North Kingstown 48 6.7 179 23.5 6.5
North Providence 52 33.3 113 2.7 -6.9
North Smithfield 19 18.8 130 0.0 3.6
Pawtucket 59 43.9 100 13.6 -8.8
Portsmouth 24 0.0 249 24.4 -17.5
Providence 107 15.1 98 23.9 -10.9
Richmond 13 -23.5 130 -1.3 -14.6
Scituate 21 90.9 128 12.1 -29.2
Smithfield 16 -20.0 146 29.9 -2.1
South Kingstown 50 6.4 186 19.6 -4.0
Tiverton 20 -23.1 131 21.9 -11.2
Warren 10 11.1 147 13.0 -33.3
Warwick 185 4.5 118 23.9 -6.1
West Greenwich 9 80.0 126 27.5 8.7
West Warwick 44 46.7 99 39.6 -15.9
Westerly 40 8.1 355 11.3 10.8
Woonsocket 24 -22.6 71 28.8 -21.3

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in The Ocean State Current, including text, graphics, images, and information are solely those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the views and opinions of The Current, the RI Center for Freedom & Prosperity, or its members or staff. The Current cannot be held responsible for information posted or provided by third-party sources. Readers are encouraged to fact check any information on this web site with other sources.

YOUR CART
  • No products in the cart.
0