Survival Rate Hits New High of 99.6% Yet Policy Continues to Badly Lag

AidaL-BacklitChain-featured

The CDC’s current best estimate of the survival rate of COVID-19 is 99.6%.  This is a new high for the reported survival rate which has been climbing for weeks.  The news is even better than it appears as this number includes only symptomatic cases.  The true survival rate will almost certainly turn out to be higher when asymptomatic cases, which the CDC estimates at 35%, are added to the calculation.

This latest estimate of the survival rate, reached by subtracting the fatality rate from one hundred, is

… consistent with other assessments. “By now, multiple studies from Europe, Japan, and the U.S. all suggest that the overall fatality rate is far lower than early estimates, perhaps below 0.1 to 0.4%, i.e., ten to forty times lower than estimates that motivated extreme isolation,” Dr. Scott Atlas, a senior fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, told lawmakers in early May, referring to the infection rate.

There have been a slew of other encouraging developments including, most recently, that Denmark reopened schools and day care centers and did not see a rise in cases, emulating Finland’s experience.

Following a one-month lockdown, Denmark allowed children between two to 12 years back in day cares and schools on April 15. Based on five weeks’ worth of data, health authorities are now for the first time saying the move did not make the virus proliferate.

It is inexplicable that governors of still-locked down states like Rhode Island have been so very slow to incorporate the most important data point – the survival rate – into their response to COVID-19, as well as the outcome of numerous real life re-open experiments, including Denmark, Finland, Georgia, Florida and Texas.  The result has been that “flatten the curve” has turned into a rolling, open-ended project that has needlessly prolonged a debilitating – health-wise, academically, economically – lockdown long past achievement of the original goal of protecting hospitals.  It is also near the top of a long list of evidence and reasons that a lockdown is a really bad idea and can never be repeated.



  • ShannonEntropy

    A recent NY study found a whopping **88%** of people who test positive are asymptomatic

    https://wapo.st/3eBUtKW

    And when the US Navy tested TR sailors they found the asymptomatic rate to be ~ 60%

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-military-sympt-idUSKCN21Y2GB

    The Trvth prolly lies somewhere between those two values, but the trve death rate from C-19 is most likely less than 0.1% — significantly lower than your typical flu bug

    The CDC combines all flu and all pneumonia deaths under one category to make those two the 8th leading cause of death in the US. But if yer under age 70 and not obese or suffering from obesity-related diseases like diabetes &/or not confined to a “congregate care facility”, yer more likely to die from a shark attack in Hundred Acre Cove than from C-19

    Def worth destroying the entire economy over and keeping everyone on permanent lockdown, IMHO

  • ShannonEntropy