Yesterday, I mentioned the news that Tiverton resident and infectious disease specialist Dr. Timothy Flanigan had flown to Liberia to help revive a hospital that closed down in the midst of the Ebola epidemic in Africa. That post includes a list of items that Dr. Flanigan has requested people to donate. A local nonprofit charity with which I’m affiliated is helping to raise money, as well.
Tim has started a blog to chronicle his experiences there for family, friends, and all of us. By the marvels of modern technology (text message, in this case), he tells me that he’ll have much more content soon, including other ways that people can help.
In the meantime, tax-deductible credit card and PayPal donations can be made through Tiverton Cares using the “Donate” button below, or checks (made out to “Tiverton Cares” and marked “Ebola”) can be sent to P.O. Box 525, Tiverton, RI 02878. With the exception of transaction fees from PayPal, all donations will go directly to the cause.
Jorge Elorza makes a sweeping claim that all possibilities of God can be reduced to “four views of God that cover the entire spectrum: the theist, deist, atheist, and what I call the memist view”. The meaning of the atheist possibility is clear: there is no God. The deist God, meanwhile, “does not perform miracles, does not interact with His believers, and does not intervene in the natural world”, while the memist God, according to Elorza, “resides entirely in the minds of its adherents”.
Remember, it’s Elorza who claims that his categories are comprehensive. And, in the end, what Elorza said in the law review article is different from what he said on Newsmakers….
From the crowd of people receiving pensions through the state of Rhode Island’s system — 10,884 of them having retired from state jobs — Irene Parenteau has stepped into the spotlight to state that General Treasurer and gubernatorial candidate Gina Raimondo “betrayed” her. She’s not getting cost of living adjustments to her pension, you see, after the reform that Raimondo ushered through the General Assembly a few years ago.
One interesting discovery an investigator might make is that there are actually two Irene Parenteaus in Rhode Island, and both of them have state pensions.
Small state fun facts aside, though, the Irene Parenteau who has entered into politics to make a TV ad for a competing candidate retired in 2010 at the age of 66. According to state records, she had 23 years of service, which puts her hiring with the state at about age 43.
Over those years, Mrs. Parenteau contributed $50,431 toward her own pension., and according to the calculation on RIOpenGov.org’s pension module she will receive an estimated $370,684 in pension payments even if she never sees another cost of living adjustment. That is, over the next 21 years or so, she’ll get back more than seven times what she put in over her 23 years as an employee, even after her “betrayal.”
The average Rhode Islander (let alone those making the decision to leave their home state in search of opportunity) might not much mind being betrayed like that.
If there were an award for a Rhode Island political item beyond what anybody would make up, the first item in today’s Providence Journal Political Scene might take it.
Former state representative (and Democrat) Lisa Baldelli-Hunt, now mayor of Woonsocket, just fired former state representative (and Democrat) Jon Brien, who had been serving as the city’s part-time prosecuting attorney. Delivering the news to Brien was current state representative (and Democrat) Michael Marcello, who is the city’s solicitor. Filling the prosecutor job on an interim basis will be Thomas DeSimone, brother of current representative (and Democrat majority leader) John DeSimone.
Here’s the kicker. Asked how she settled on Mr. DeSimone as her guy, Baldelli-Hunt:
… she said she called the House speaker’s office and asked for a recommendation when she found herself on a Friday with no one to go to court for the city the following Monday, Aug. 18.
Ultimately, all that can really be said about this farce is that the people of Rhode Island voted for it.
Tim Flanigan, an infectious disease specialist from Tiverton, has headed off to Liberia to fight Ebola, and he has a few simple requests.
My op-ed in today’s Providence Journal places the match of Rhode Island’s experience of the tobacco settlement money (a one-time-fix turned bad debt) on the pile of bad decisions that the state government has made in the past decade or so:
According to a review by ProPublica, Rhode Island has just refinanced some of the resulting debt, with the expectation that “the deal would shave $700 million off a $2.8 billion tab due on the bonds in 2052.” In that regard, it’s a bit like the state’s pension reform, which was marketed as salvation but merely shaved about $3 billion from $9 billion of unfunded liability.
The people who operate Rhode Island’s government are racking up quite a list of these liabilities.
Justin and Bob Plain pick favorites in some primaries and argue about pensions and government labor unions.
Mayoral Candidate and former Rhode Island judge Jorge Elorza illustrates the progressive faith (and its weakness) in his argument that public schools can and should teach the non-existence of God.
Providence ranks 196 out of 200 in Allstate’s 2014 “Best Drivers Report”, ranked by average years between accidents. Apparently it’ a regional thing, since 3 of the 4 cities below Providence are in Massachusetts (with Washington D.C. as the 4th)…
195. Baltimore, MD; 5.4 yrs
196. Providence, RI; 5.4 yrs
197. Springfield, MA; 5.4 yrs
198. Washington, DC; 5.1 yrs
199. Boston, MA; 4.4 yrs
200. Worcester, MA; 4.3 yrs
State Senator William Conley (D, East Providence, Pawtucket) has served as legal counsel for the state Ethics Commission, but records show that he may have violated the Code of Ethics when he took additional work from the state after having been elected to office.
PolitiFact’s election season coddling of Clay Pell raises points about its own biases and his worldview.
Literally, and I mean literally nothing surprises me anymore about this election cycle.
— James Koloski (@jkoloski) August 28, 2014
How about a candidate for Providence Mayor who claims he can prove that it is “overwhelmingly unlikely that the theist God exists”? That candidate is…
It’s almost difficult to remember what it was like, in that long era before the veil dropped during the second term of President George W. Bush, back when we actually had to debate whether the mainstream news media was biased. It’s almost as if the MSM decided that the charade wasn’t worth maintaining back when that picture of Bush walking with a copy of Bernie Goldberg’s book, Bias, made the rounds.
After the vitriol and lies intended to destroy the Bush presidency and the cult-like madness and cover-ups to promote the Obama presidency, can there be any real doubt that, on the whole, mainstream journalists are, as Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit frequently states, Democrat operatives with bylines?
Seth Mandel suggests that media bias is central to the perhaps-destined-to-be-successful strategy of the IRS to cover up its unconstitutional, tyrannical targeting of conservative activists to help ensure the reelection of Obama:
If the latest revelations about the IRS are correct, then its officials have approached the abuse-of-power scandal with a clear strategy, pretty much from the beginning. They have been betting that, since their illegal targeting campaign against those who disagree with President Obama has had the backing of Democrats in Congress, they needed only a media strategy, not a political one. And that media strategy appears to have been: conceal or destroy potential (and actual) evidence, and assume that this activity will be less damaging than whatever is in the files they’ve worked to hide.
It’s a direct challenge to the media, in other words.
It’s not a direct challenge. It’s an echo, a commiseration, evidence of solidarity. After all, if the news media were willing to throw away any plausible ability to defend its objectivity in order to bring about the era of hopenchange, why should the IRS (or the rest of the federal bureaucracy) be any different?
It may be that the only two opportunities for the United States to avoid dissolution and/or nation-rending violence are for the American people finally to stop paying attention to News Media Incorporated or for those professional journalists and editors to take it as a learning experience that they were played for saps to promote a thuggish regime that embodies everything the standard liberal narrative warned against beneath a very thin veneer of the platitudes that liberals like to believe they believe in.
Is it OK to have a Governor that needs to be away from his duties to fulfill his required US Coast Guard Reservist obligations?
RI Education Commissioner Deborah Gist has decided it’s reasonable to hold off on standardized testing as a graduation requirement until the next decade, and Rhode Islanders should expect it to be delayed again, and again.
… is that they don’t have a union:
Rhode Island’s 276 public schools are aging rapidly, and, at the current rate, it would cost $1.8 billion to bring them up to good condition, according to a state study.
The General Assembly in July extended a three-year moratorium on new construction until May 2015, to give leaders time to devise a way of paying for major school renovations. But superintendents say that every year the moratorium is in place, crucial maintenance and repairs go undone, driving up the cost and making bond referendums less palatable to voters.
In any given organization, the people who implement the budget will look at the revenue that they expect to bring in versus the needs of the organization (the expenses). That includes long-term planning, estimating the life of buildings and planning for improvements.
When it comes to government schools, though, the law requires that some money be siphoned off in order to pay a labor union to be constantly advocating to increase the cost of personnel. Because they are public-sector unions, their advocacy extends to getting people who are sympathetic to their cause in office — both on the school committee that is supposed to negotiate on behalf of taxpayers and in the state legislator and executive roles that set the larger framework in which the government schools operate.
This practice corrupts the ability of school departments and the public to prioritize anything other than higher pay for employees. Things like ensuring that a century-old building isn’t going to fall apart around the students must be accomplished in addition to the unions’ demands. Either the extra costs for buildings must be hidden within state-level taxes, or the dollars must be borrowed.
Inevitability is difficult to prove, but it seems likely that Rhode Island’s current predicament — falling into a downward spiral when it comes to building maintenance while also failing to get satisfactory results despite high spending on employees — is inevitable when employees are required to organize to control all sides of every negotiation.
I just got a pre-recorded call from Clay Pell and Michelle Kwan (“Paid for by Clay Pell for Governor”) advertising a campaign event at a Middletown public school on Monday.
It makes sense, I suppose, that the hand-picked candidate of a teachers’ union would take that route. After all, the unions are very familiar with the value of using school property and resources (such as school phone-tree announcements and handouts sent home with students) to give political activism an official feel.
I don’t know where the lines are for use of school property for political events, but this feels vaguely wrong. If I were advising any other candidate for office, I’d suggest demanding use of the same space at the same time of day for the same length of time.
Judging from Amity Shlaes’s book, Coolidge, presidents of the early Twentieth Century vacationed by means of a Summer White House. To be sure, technology then wasn’t as it is now, so a mobile base of operations was an elaborate undertaking that would lend itself to such thinking.
Much of the trip wasn’t a vacation so much as working in a different place, and even the leisure activities were meant to serve a diplomatic function. In South Dakota, for example, President Coolidge’s visit was meant, on his part, as a means of understanding the people of the region (and their similarities) and, on the part of South Dakotans, as a means of showing off their state to the president and to the country.
Consequently, when the Associated Press comes to the defense of President Obama at the beginning of the Twenty-First Century, saying that “President Obama has spent less time away from the White House” than his predecessors, one gets the sense that the point is being missed. The news media of Coolidge’s day reported how many fish he caught and speculated about his displeasure when his wife got lost in a stroll through the woods. That is, “how is the president faring in an unfamiliar region of our country?”
In Matthew Continetti’s telling, it’s as if Obama has inverted everything. The fact that he’s away from the White House is mainly immaterial, because President Obama seems to be disengaged and living it up no matter where he is:
For this president, the distinction between “time off” and “time on” is meaningless. For this president, every day is a vacation. And has been for some time. He is like Cosmo Kramer of Seinfeld. “His whole life is a fantasy camp,” George Costanza says of his friend. “People should plunk down $2,000 to live like him for a week.” Imagine what they would pay to live like Obama.
In her AP article, Darlene Superville notes that President Bush had spent more “partial or complete days” at his ranch in Crawford, plus 26 at the Bush family estate in Kennebunkport, Maine. That may have lacked the diplomatic investment of a South Dakota excursion, but it still gives more the sense of a second White House than yet another circuit of golf, beach, dining out, and concerts on the Vineyard.
Justin and Bob Plain discuss the morality and economics of funding art through the government.
Whether it violates the Code of Ethics for legislators or their employers to take money from state agencies depends on the specifics of the case and requires clarification from the state Ethics Commission.