Left’s “Tax the Rich” Plan, Means Avg. Family will be Poorer

PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Public and private employee unions along with their Left-leaning allies and elected officials in Rhode Island, for years, have been seeking to punish success by raising taxes on wealthy residents.

Why? So the state can spend more money on projects that benefit unions and big-government spenders. Oh, and, of course, in echoing their two favorite, yet mindless, sayings … it’s important for the rich to ‘pay their fair share’ and to advance ‘social equity’ … both of which are false. 

What they don’t tell you is that the rich already pay taxes at a far-higher rate than average families, and that this tax on success actually lowers the standard of living for almost everyone else. This is not social equity. In fact, it’s the opposite.

When the government seizes money and takes it out of productive use in the free market, spending it, instead, on politically-advantageous projects … economic growth necessarily suffers. Taxing the rich means less money for the wealthy to invest in forming new business ventures, expanding existing operations, creating new jobs, producing more goods at lower prices, and raising wages for employees.

Success and wealth are good things that every Ocean Stater should aspire to achieve … they should not be punished by government. More success and more wealth are even better … especially when that wealth is re-invested in a productive manner that raises our standard of living.

Excessive government spending only benefits insider special interest groups, like unions, and the politicians who seek to ‘buy your vote’. These tax-and-spend polices also bring-on higher inflation and make the rest of us a bit poorer.

The column below explains why … 

***

Leftists’ Wealth Tax Proposal Means Poorer Standard of Living for All

Democrats’ new wealth tax proposal would mean fewer innovations, more costly products, fewer jobs, and a poorer standard of living for all.

A group of far-left lawmakers has introduced yet another bill to soak the rich.

The new bill is called the Oppose Limitless Inequality Growth and Reverse Community Harms Act—the OLIGARCH Act. Get it? It would introduce an entirely new tax on wealth above $120 million, starting at 2% and climbing to 8%. This new tax would be in addition to the income tax.

Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., claims the legislation is designed to “tax extreme wealth, reduce inequality, and combat the threat to democracy posed by aristocracy.” But it would more accurately be described as an economic devastation bill. Indeed, it should alarm anyone who wants to start a business, build up wealth for retirement, leave an inheritance for their children, or just see the economy grow for everyone.

First, let’s examine the practical effects of the bill. Consider Jeff Bezos, who has a net worth of around $155 billion. Under the OLIGARCH Act, he would owe about $9.7 billion at the end of the year.

Does Bezos have that amount just sitting in a bank account? No, his wealth is tied up in businesses and real assets. Redistributing Bezos’s wealth requires disrupting Amazon’s business operations. He would have to sell shares to pay his tax bill, which would make it harder for Amazon to raise capital, create jobs, provide selling opportunities for other businesses, and scale its operations to lower prices for customers. The result would be decreased availability of goods and increased costs for tens of millions of American families.

The bill’s authors make the cavalier assumption that wealth is simply a pile of gold that the wealthy sit on—that it’s just sitting around, waiting to be taken and redistributed. That’s nowhere near the case. Almost all the wealth of the people targeted by this bill is tied up in businesses that produce goods and services, provide jobs, and drive the innovation that raises our standard of living.

The bill would also discourage future entrepreneurs. What about the next innovator working in a dingy office with an old door for a desk and his company’s name badly spray-painted on a nearby sign? How many entrepreneurs would be willing to risk their savings, to hustle and grind to bring a product to market, when the government will just tax away their reward for their hard work? The inventions and innovations that produce “extreme” wealth would likely never come to fruition.

However, the true problem with this bill is much deeper than its economic effects. The bill’s authors fundamentally misunderstand wealth and its value to society. They assume that wealth is bad, that extreme wealth is worse, and that it’s the government’s job to stop people from getting too wealthy.

They have it exactly backward. Building wealth is something to be lauded and celebrated, and the government should let each of us get as wealthy as possible. Everyone’s lives have improved, especially those at lower income levels, thanks to innovators and pioneers whose passion for doing things smarter, better, faster, and cheaper resulted in them creating things no one thought possible.

These entrepreneurs and inventors got rich because they cured diseases, perfected treatments, invented safer tools, brought conveniences to the mass market, and improved the lives of millions of people other than themselves. The wealth they accumulated reflects the value they created. Moreover, their wealth allows them to continue to guide their businesses or to invest in the dreams of other innovators, passing on their knowledge to the next generation.

Consider the case of Gary Michelson, the billionaire spinal surgeon. Michelson built his wealth by developing breakthrough tools and methods of spinal surgery after seeing his grandmother afflicted with neurogenic spinal degeneration. His work made spinal surgery safer and more consistent, increased the longevity of spinal implants, and reduced recovery time for patients. His inventions were so prolific that he eventually accumulated more than 900 patents to his name, which he later sold for more than $1 billion.

Michelson then used his wealth to found a multitude of charitable organizations that direct funds to promising medical research, fighting neglected diseases, making college more affordable, and improving animal welfare.

In fact, most of the world’s biggest charitable organizations were founded by “extreme” wealth. Under the wealth tax in the OLIGARCH Act, those charities wouldn’t exist, or they would be a shadow of themselves.

In total, innovators only end up getting a fraction of the benefits from their breakthroughs. The bulk of the value benefits the rest of us through newer and cheaper products, which continue to raise our standard of living.

An honest accounting of successful entrepreneurs in America should focus not on the wealth some have accumulated but on the multitude of benefits that their work brings to society as a whole.

 

 

YOUR CART
  • No products in the cart.
0